cashflow

Why Small Contractors Run Out of Cash Even When Projects Are Profitable: A Quantity Surveyor’s Hard-Earned Insights

I’ve been working as a quantity surveyor and contract manager for over three years now, and in this relatively short time, I’ve witnessed something that continues to baffle outsiders but haunts those of us in the construction industry: profitable contractors going broke. Yes, you read that correctly. I’ve seen small to medium-sized contractors with healthy profit margins on their books literally unable to pay their subcontractors, suppliers, or even their own staff salaries.

The first time I truly understood this paradox wasn’t through observing a stranger’s business, it hit far closer to home. A successful contractor, not anyone else but my father, who had closed countless successful construction projects all across Pakistan, not even one of them had closed with loss, but at the end he ended up with minus bank statements and was not able to pay subcontractors. That moment shattered every assumption I had about construction finance. Here was a man with an impeccable track record, with project after project showing healthy profits, yet he sat there unable to meet his most basic obligations. That’s when I realized profit and cash are two entirely different animals in construction, and understanding this difference isn’t optional—it’s survival.

The Core Paradox: Profitable but Broke

In my experience, a surprising number of small contractor failures involve businesses that were technically profitable, they didn’t fail because margins were zero, they failed because cash arrived too late..

This is the brutal truth of construction finance: profit and cash are not the same thing. A contractor can show healthy profit margins on their books while literally unable to pay staff salaries. The gap between what you’ve earned and what you can actually spend is where businesses die.

The Reality: A PKR 13 Million Project Example

Let me show you exactly how this happens with a real project scenario I’m managing right now. A contractor has a PKR 13 million commercial fit-out project with a contracted 18% profit margin. That’s PKR 2.3 million in profit on paper, a healthy, profitable job by any measure.

Here’s their actual cash reality:

  • Day 0: Mobilization spending: PKR 1.7 million (tender participation, site visits, indirect costs)
  • Day 15: Labour payments: PKR 4.3 million
  • Day 30: First valuation submitted: PKR 6.7 million of the completed milestone.
  • Day 45: Valuation certified
  • Day 60-75: Payment received: PKR 6.1 million (after 10% retention)
  • Day 60: Already spent another PKR 4.5 million on ongoing works

The Numbers:

  • Total spent: PKR 10.5 Million
  • Total received: PKR 6.1 Million
  • Cash deficit: Almost PKR 4.5 million on a profitable project

This is a single project. Multiply this across three or four concurrent projects, and you’re looking at cash deficits of PKR 14,000,000-18,000,000 even when cumulative profits show PKR 5,000,000-8,000,000 in the positive.

The contractor will eventually make their 18% profit, but only after months of financing the gap themselves, paying interest on overdrafts, and praying that no payment gets delayed. One late payment from the client could push them into insolvency, despite being profitable on paper.

The 5 Real Reasons Contractors Run Out of Cash

After three years managing these contracts, I’ve identified the specific culprits behind this profit-versus-cash paradox:

1. Retention: The Silent Cash Killer

Small contractors typically face 5-10% retention held until practical completion, plus another 2.5-5% until defects liability ends. This money sits on their balance sheet but doesn’t exist in their bank account. On a PKR 2 million project portfolio, that’s PKR 100,000-300,000 of their money locked away, money they’ve already paid out to suppliers and subcontractors. Meanwhile, they’re paying 9-12% interest on overdrafts to cover the gap. It’s an interest-free loan from the party least able to afford it to the party best positioned to bear the cost.

2. Payment Delays: Contractual Fiction vs. Reality

While contracts typically stipulate payment within 14-30 days of valuation certification, the actual average I’m seeing is 47 days. I’ve had clients waiting 90+ days for payments that were contractually due in 21 days. During that extended period, interest on overdrafts accumulates—I’ve calculated this cost at between 2.8-4.5% of project value annually. The contractor has already paid their suppliers on day 30 and subcontractors on day 35, but they won’t see client payment until day 75 or later.

3. Front-Loaded Costs: Spending Before Earning

Construction projects don’t spend money evenly. Site mobilization, material procurement, and preliminary works mean 45-55% of total costs occur in the first 30% of the project timeline. But payment schedules often follow a linear or back-loaded pattern. On a recent PKR 5,200,000 project, the contractor spent PKR 2,670,000 in weeks 1-8 of a 28-week project, but received only PKR 1,656,000 in actual cash (after retention)—a PKR 1,014,000 cash deficit at the 30% completion point of a profitable project.

4. Subcontractor Payment Term Mismatch

Main contractors receive payments on 30-60 day terms but must pay subcontractors on 7-21 day terms. This creates a 30-45 day cash gap where contractors are obligated to pay out before they receive payment in. On labor-intensive projects where subcontractor costs represent 60-70% of total costs, this timing mismatch can create cash deficits of PKR 600,000-1,000,000 on a PKR 4,400,000 project. The contractor becomes an unwilling bank, providing interest-free loans to everyone else in the supply chain while paying interest themselves.

5. Variation Orders: The Cash Black Hole

Changes to the original scope create massive cash flow problems. The work must be done immediately, costs must be paid immediately, but payment is often delayed for months while variations are priced, negotiated, and agreed. I currently have PKR 5,234,000 in pending variation order claims across my active projects, work that’s been completed, costs that have been incurred, but payment that remains uncertain. Some variations have been in dispute for 6-8 months. The contractor paid their suppliers on day 30 but won’t receive payment until day 120-180, financing months of disputed work out of their own pocket.

The Solutions: How to Bridge the Profit-Cash Gap

After witnessing these problems firsthand, I’ve developed several approaches that actually work. These aren’t theoretical, these are practical measures I’ve implemented with my clients:

1. Aggressive Cash Flow Forecasting Create detailed 13-week rolling cash flow forecasts showing week-by-week cash requirements, expected payment dates (realistic, not contractual), and peak cash deficit periods. When you can see that Week 7 will require PKR 8,000,000 but you’ll only have PKR 3,000,000 available, you have six weeks to arrange bridging finance.

2. Front-Load Payment Applications Where contracts permit, structure payment applications to reflect actual cost profiles rather than simple percentage completion. If 55% of costs occur in the first 30% of the timeline, the payment application should reflect that. This can reduce peak cash requirements by 25-35%.

3. Subcontractor Payment Alignment Align subcontractor payment terms with your own payment receipt timing through “pay when paid” clauses, extended payment terms (35-40 days instead of 14-21 days), or staged payments tied to client payment milestones. The goal isn’t to exploit subcontractors, it’s to distribute the cash flow burden fairly rather than concentrating it entirely on the main contractor.

4. Variation Order Management Systems Implement strict protocols: document variation instructions within 24 hours, submit pricing within 3-5 days, include variations at estimated value in payment applications immediately (even before final agreement), and fast-track disputed variations to adjudication. This has reduced average variation payment delays from 120+ days to 45-60 days on my projects.

5. Strategic Project Selectivity Not all profitable projects are worth taking. Evaluate projects based on cash flow impact, not just profit margin. Red flags include clients with payment delay history, excessive retention percentages, significant upfront mobilization costs, long payment cycles (45+ days), and milestone payment structures that don’t match cost profiles. A project with 18% margin but terrible payment terms might be less valuable than one with 12% margin but excellent cash flow.

6. Working Capital Adequacy Maintain working capital of at least 20-25% of annual turnover before taking on additional projects. This means PKR 2,000,000-2,500,000 working capital for PKR 10 million turnover. Without adequate working capital, even profitable projects become existential threats.

7. Invoice Financing Once a valuation is certified, access 70-85% of the certified amount immediately from a finance company, paying a fee of 1.5-3%. This converts a 45-60 day payment cycle into a 3-5 day payment cycle. On a PKR 100,000 valuation, you pay PKR 1,500-3,000 in fees but receive PKR 70,000-85,000 immediately rather than waiting two months.

8. Client Payment Performance Tracking Maintain detailed records of every client’s payment performance: average days to payment, percentage of late payments, retention release timing, and dispute resolution approach. This data informs future decisions and helps adjust pricing to account for poor payment performance.

9. Controlled Growth Strategy Limit growth to what your working capital can support. Maximum safe revenue = Working capital ÷ 0.20. A contractor with PKR 100,000 in working capital should not exceed PKR 500,000 in annual revenue until they’ve built up more capital. Growth must be funded—growing faster than your cash can support is a recipe for insolvency, even if every project is profitable.

I’ve seen contractors significantly reduce cash stress when they track timing properly and stop managing projects using only profit percentages. The biggest improvement isn’t just financial, it’s peace of mind. When you can see the next 30–60 days clearly, you stop reacting late and start planning early.

If you want to see a simple cash flow tracking sample for a real project, feel free to email me at mhumayoon18@gmail.com and I’ll share it.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

whatsapp image 2026 01 28 at 5.44.38 pm

Muhammad Humayoon

A seasoned quantity surveyor representing estimation and tender stretagies and contract partiticipation in the construction industry.